<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $750 for a Review?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html</link>
	<description>It's all in the luck of the dice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:09:31 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HMTKSteve</title>
		<link>http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-13110</link>
		<dc:creator>HMTKSteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 16:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html#comment-13110</guid>
		<description>It is the highest badge you can use without getting your account customized.

I&#039;ll probably take it down in a few weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is the highest badge you can use without getting your account customized.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll probably take it down in a few weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jez</title>
		<link>http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-12996</link>
		<dc:creator>Jez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html#comment-12996</guid>
		<description>Hi Steve,

You finally got round to posting on this then :-)

I have only done a couple of PPP&#039;s and dont think I will be doing more.

As you say they are either trashy or asking for PR7 +, and not much in between.

ReveiwMe is better, you get a better flat fee, although they take a big slice.

I have often wondered why people use ReveiewMe, when they could just use it to identify blogs and contact them directly... 

I think I would use PPP to buy backlinks in the future, but writing a review for $6.50 (which a lot of them are) is plain silly.

I dont know why you have the $750 reveiw me badge up though, just to grab attention??

Jez</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Steve,</p>
<p>You finally got round to posting on this then :-)</p>
<p>I have only done a couple of PPP&#8217;s and dont think I will be doing more.</p>
<p>As you say they are either trashy or asking for PR7 +, and not much in between.</p>
<p>ReveiwMe is better, you get a better flat fee, although they take a big slice.</p>
<p>I have often wondered why people use ReveiewMe, when they could just use it to identify blogs and contact them directly&#8230; </p>
<p>I think I would use PPP to buy backlinks in the future, but writing a review for $6.50 (which a lot of them are) is plain silly.</p>
<p>I dont know why you have the $750 reveiw me badge up though, just to grab attention??</p>
<p>Jez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Britton</title>
		<link>http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-12808</link>
		<dc:creator>James Britton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html#comment-12808</guid>
		<description>Someone may be just crazy enough to do it, or like Andy said you may be approached directly for a better deal. Not a bad little scheme Steve :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone may be just crazy enough to do it, or like Andy said you may be approached directly for a better deal. Not a bad little scheme Steve :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KellyCho</title>
		<link>http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-12661</link>
		<dc:creator>KellyCho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 01:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html#comment-12661</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s really honorable, I like that!
I was recently introduced to PPP and signed on as my initial reaction was &quot;That&#039;s a pretty good idea!&quot;  but when I started thinking about it, I came to the same conclusion as you... you&#039;re pretty much selling out your readers.  All of my posts are about things I&#039;m interested in and hopefully what my readers are also interested in so it would be really hard for me to put up a post about a product or site I don&#039;t really care about except for how much they&#039;re paying me to post it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really honorable, I like that!<br />
I was recently introduced to PPP and signed on as my initial reaction was &#8220;That&#8217;s a pretty good idea!&#8221;  but when I started thinking about it, I came to the same conclusion as you&#8230; you&#8217;re pretty much selling out your readers.  All of my posts are about things I&#8217;m interested in and hopefully what my readers are also interested in so it would be really hard for me to put up a post about a product or site I don&#8217;t really care about except for how much they&#8217;re paying me to post it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-12660</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 01:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html#comment-12660</guid>
		<description>I agree! 50% is a big cut and I won&#039;t be surprised if the advertisers directly approach their targeted blog for advertising.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree! 50% is a big cut and I won&#8217;t be surprised if the advertisers directly approach their targeted blog for advertising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Untwisted Vortex - Living in a Different Land &#187; Blog Rolling for 2007-03-26</title>
		<link>http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-12522</link>
		<dc:creator>Untwisted Vortex - Living in a Different Land &#187; Blog Rolling for 2007-03-26</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html#comment-12522</guid>
		<description>[...] at http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html told us why he&#8217;s charging $750 for website reviews. Good thing he didn&#8217;t charge me when [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at <a href="http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html</a> told us why he&#8217;s charging $750 for website reviews. Good thing he didn&#8217;t charge me when [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan J. Parker</title>
		<link>http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-12466</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan J. Parker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 14:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html#comment-12466</guid>
		<description>$750 ... what a steal! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$750 &#8230; what a steal! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyndonmaxewell</title>
		<link>http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html/comment-page-1#comment-12311</link>
		<dc:creator>lyndonmaxewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmtk.com/archives/750-for-a-review.html#comment-12311</guid>
		<description>I guess that the large cut is befitting for the blogs on the smaller end, not the higher end ones. 50% is actually too much of a cut for them. IF I were an advertiser, and I see what I like on ReviewMe, I would definitely approached the blogger or site directly by email instead, as I know I may be able to cut a better deal with th person. What do you think, since we know how the system works?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that the large cut is befitting for the blogs on the smaller end, not the higher end ones. 50% is actually too much of a cut for them. IF I were an advertiser, and I see what I like on ReviewMe, I would definitely approached the blogger or site directly by email instead, as I know I may be able to cut a better deal with th person. What do you think, since we know how the system works?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

