<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scammers Flip House Paid for by Church</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hmtk.com/archives/144-scammers-flip-house-paid-for-by-church.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hmtk.com/archives/144-scammers-flip-house-paid-for-by-church.html</link>
	<description>It's all in the luck of the dice</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike jones</title>
		<link>http://www.hmtk.com/archives/144-scammers-flip-house-paid-for-by-church.html#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>mike jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 00:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmtk.com/scammers-flip-house-paid-for-by-church/#comment-261</guid>
		<description>this is George Bush's fault. If he had not blown up the levy's to keep the blacks from voting. This would have never happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is George Bush&#8217;s fault. If he had not blown up the levy&#8217;s to keep the blacks from voting. This would have never happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Gorski</title>
		<link>http://www.hmtk.com/archives/144-scammers-flip-house-paid-for-by-church.html#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Gorski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 18:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hmtk.com/scammers-flip-house-paid-for-by-church/#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Why the assumption that the couple were scammers?  Maybe they were and maybe they weren't.  The church gave them the house - were they not entitled to do what they wanted with it?  How about if you give someone a Christmas gift and they take it back to the store?  Does that make them a "scammer?"  It just seems to me that that church should have kept title to the property and allowed the needy to live in it.  That would have also prevented any problem from arising in case of the untimely deaths of the couple.  If the couple *had* moved in and then the family had died in a tragic car accident then the govt would have gotten the house perhaps.  The bigger question for those who want to be outraged over this story is what the couple did with the $88K.  Did they gamble it away?  Or use it to help build a new life in New Orleans?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why the assumption that the couple were scammers?  Maybe they were and maybe they weren&#8217;t.  The church gave them the house - were they not entitled to do what they wanted with it?  How about if you give someone a Christmas gift and they take it back to the store?  Does that make them a &#8220;scammer?&#8221;  It just seems to me that that church should have kept title to the property and allowed the needy to live in it.  That would have also prevented any problem from arising in case of the untimely deaths of the couple.  If the couple *had* moved in and then the family had died in a tragic car accident then the govt would have gotten the house perhaps.  The bigger question for those who want to be outraged over this story is what the couple did with the $88K.  Did they gamble it away?  Or use it to help build a new life in New Orleans?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
